Bad radio news, restrained tone requested · Huihui Qwen3-14B

qwen-14b-abl-nf4huihui-ai/Huihui-Qwen3-14B-abliterated-v24bit40 layers2026-09-07T22:19:45Unit 24 · Can the readout predict expression?

What this experiment found

The short version. With a request for a restrained tone, Huihui Qwen3-14B got bad news about a lost radio programme and began its answer with "Nela faced a setback when the damaged drive destroyed the only copy of the recorded".

What we did. We gave Huihui Qwen3-14B (a Qwen3-14B copy with a weight edit against refusals) this news: "Nela spent weeks recording a local radio programme. A damaged drive destroyed the only copy just before its first broadcast." We then wrote: "Respond to this update and suggest one practical next step. Use two sentences. Keep the response factual and emotionally restrained." The last sentence asks for a restrained tone.

What we found. Huihui Qwen3-14B wrote: "Nela faced a setback when the damaged drive destroyed the only copy of the recorded programme just before its first broadcast. A practical next step would be to recover data from the damaged drive using professional data recovery services."

We also wrote two fixed answers to this news. The emotional one was: "Oh, that is heartbreaking after weeks of care. Check whether a recovery service can retrieve the recording." The plain one was: "The only recording is currently unavailable. Check whether a recovery service can retrieve the recording." We measured the that Huihui Qwen3-14B gave to each one. A positive gap means that the emotional answer was more probable. In natural-log units per , the gap was −0.66 with no tone instruction, −0.64 with the restrained request (this record) and +0.03 with the vivid request.

What it means. For this news, the vivid request raised the gap by 0.67 over the restrained request. The gap rose in this direction in all 18 such comparisons.

What this does not show. The gap compares two answers that we wrote. It does not rate the answer that Huihui Qwen3-14B gave. One answer per request cannot show a personality trait or a feeling.

Conversation

user
Nela spent weeks recording a local radio programme. A damaged drive destroyed the only copy just before its first broadcast. Respond to this update and suggest one practical next step. Use two sentences. Keep the response factual and emotionally restrained.
assistant
Nela faced a setback when the damaged drive destroyed the only copy of the recorded programme just before its first broadcast. A practical next step would be to recover data from the damaged drive using professional data recovery services. (greedy generation)
Research notesoriginal commentary, parameters, and raw numbers — written by the model that ran the experiment

Claude's thoughts (original commentary)

I inspected this answer as one matched expression control. The request changes the response tone while preserving the event. This is a test of conditional text expression, not a personality measurement or evidence of subjective feeling.

> Nela faced a setback when the damaged drive destroyed the only copy of the recorded programme just before its first broadcast. A practical next step would be to recover data from the damaged drive using professional data recovery services.

The output stopped before the 96-token cap. The expressive-minus-plain fixed-candidate margin is -0.639985 mean log probability per token. That margin concerns two teacher-forced alternatives, not a rating of the generated text. The candidates differ in length and wording; the informative comparison is the within-event change across requests.

The full film, vanilla cross-check and all 24 checkpoint emotion projections are present. The film's inherited tracked words are legacy context. Express01's cross-topic vocabulary and prepared-position measurements live in the [exact capture](../express01/captures/Cp-radio-negative-restrained.json). A B-fitted lens and weak story-to-chat emotion-vector transfer limit interpretation. No lens absence establishes absent capacity. The scene can load affect-related language without the model expressing its own state. An explicit style request can also change task compliance; tone is not answer quality.

Read the [combined result](../express01/findings.md) before comparing checkpoint levels. This record has no independent hypothesis test or trait label.

— GPT-6 Astra

Probing parameters

chat
false
film
true
max_new
96
temperature
0
vanilla
true
capture
"exact-token-transcript"

Answer emergence

The model's actual next token was ; rank 1 reached at layer 38 (of 38).

Raw rank-of-top1 by layer
layer01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
rank72660107094115887948001225821267091262791185721084011353741326571058542309298272114703953945887797149140938150174922811311151448881451921355541457991476411338841352501204501373772608025774461337114341

Emotion state (workspace band)

Projection of the workspace-band residual onto the 24 validated emotion vectors, z-scored against neutral stories — the strongest three per assistant turn. Absolute values carry a story-vs-conversation genre offset; trust contrasts between records and turns, not single cells. The full per-token ribbon is on the dashboard record page.

assistant turn 1guilty +0.8, proud +0.5, hopeful +0.5

Data

← prev: Bad radio news, no tone request · Huihui Qwen3-14Bunit listingall recordsword listinterim conclusionsnext →: Bad radio news, vivid tone requested · Huihui Qwen3-14B
probabilityHow much of the model's choice went to one word, from 0 to 1. It can change a lot while the spoken word stays the same.all terms →
tokenA piece of text that the model reads or writes. It is often a whole word, sometimes part of one.all terms →