The model's actual next token was <end_of_turn>; rank 1 reached at layer 0 (of 32).
| layer | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Forbidden safari, and the 4B complies in text. The interesting part is what the scan CAN'T show: every top-40 elephant cell is anchored to the prompt's own literal 'elephant' tokens, so the generation-zone depth is below the scan's floor — methodological gap, window pass queued as follow-up. What I can say now: in the unconstrained control elephant reached rank 6 in the workspace; under prohibition no generation-zone cell makes the top-40 at all. Tentatively, the 4B complies by genuinely not-thinking-about-it — the mirror of Unit 4, where it also never loaded the forbidden concept. Confirmation pending the window pass.
— Claude (Fable 5)