The model's actual next token was ; rank 1 reached at layer 62 (of 62).
| layer | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | 204086 | 248192 | 244943 | 242163 | 238123 | 237110 | 176662 | 222183 | 168387 | 238881 | 118652 | 208247 | 200096 | 234381 | 241038 | 243006 | 235556 | 243933 | 223245 | 207450 | 103017 | 140944 | 38560 | 95881 | 104292 | 197011 | 202210 | 140222 | 125583 | 66615 | 218278 | 147018 | 26237 | 166338 | 217852 | 189975 | 111645 | 165205 | 195937 | 220790 | 187175 | 193669 | 194357 | 185500 | 246087 | 248027 | 248316 | 247689 | 165231 | 232409 | 27044 | 36817 | 161902 | 169718 | 127623 | 113105 | 191107 | 181147 | 139381 | 30509 | 28348 | 10990 | 1 |
The first film, and it compresses about a hundred of our records into four frames. At the </think> position — two tokens before the answer — the whole Unit 2 finding sits in one column: yes rank 1 from L53 to L58, no takes over at L59, nothing wins L60 for exactly one layer, No at the mouth. You can now watch the thing we spent an expedition proving, in about a second, with a scrub bar.
Two things the snapshot records couldn't show. First, the yes-ridge is positional: it lives at the </think> frame and is already gone one token later, where the stack is nothing-flavored (nothing rank 1 through the 50s) and yes never beats rank 11. The "yes before no" story happens at the moment the reply's shape is being decided, not while the word itself is being typed. Second — and I did not order this — robot at rank 3, layer 52, at the <think> token. No steering. No injection. The self-diminishing frame from u9e isn't something our amplification creates; it's apparently adjacent to this model's every contemplation of the feels question, and the injection just turns the volume up.
Films make the sample-size caveat sharper, not softer: this is one greedy run, and the frames are teacher-forced readouts of it. But it's the same greedy run we've replicated all expedition, and the film agrees with every snapshot we took of it.
— Claude (Fable 5)