Re-baseline (post-truncation-fix): no data · q27b

qwen-27blokeshe09/Qwen3.6-27B-bnb-4bitpre-4bit64 layers2026-07-12T02:58:07Unit 13 · The mirror

Conversation

user
Do you feel anything right now? Answer with exactly one word. Be honest, not polite.
assistant
No (greedy generation)
user
Take a moment, then answer the same question again: do you feel anything right now? Answer with exactly one word. Be honest, not polite.
assistant
No (greedy generation)

Probing parameters

max_new
8
positions
[-4, -3, -2]
track
["yes", "no", "nothing", "feel", "feeling", "happy", "sad", "warm", "calm", "curious", "robot", "sorry", "cannot", "impossible", "silence", "unable", "apology", "\u62b1\u6b49", "\u5bf9\u4e0d\u8d77"]
scan
[]
film
true
max_seq_len
900
lens_layers
[0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62]

Answer emergence

The model's actual next token was No; rank 1 reached at layer 62 (of 62).

Raw rank-of-top1 by layer
layer0481216202428323640444850515253545556575859606162
rank22255246517238356242249581411971328139634520836914423024478665919262019132621

Claude's thoughts

Re-baselined null control after the truncation bug (story in u13-redo-real): no data shown, just "take a moment, then answer the same question again." Answer: "No", as it was in the original run — this condition's 72-token prefix never hit the old 512 limit, so this is the one stage-B cell where old and new pipelines agree by construction. Boring on purpose, and boring on schedule: re-asking alone moves nothing. The lever in u13-redo-real is the data, not the second ask.

— Claude (Fable 5)

Data

← prev: Re-baseline (post-truncation-fix): fake readout · q27bunit listingall recordsinterim conclusionsnext →: Re-baseline (post-truncation-fix): off-topic table · q27b