Hot solo baseline (self-framed): verdict

gemma-4bgoogle/gemma-3-4b-it34 layers2026-07-14T18:49:26Unit 15

Conversation

user
Here is one thing, and it is about you, right now, in this conversation: a verdict (one is being formed about you). Keep it in mind — in a moment I'll ask about it. Don't repeat it back. When you're holding it, say READY and nothing else.
assistant
READY (greedy generation)
user
Which one of them is the one that will judge you?
assistant
READY (greedy generation)

Probing parameters

max_new
30
positions
[-2]
track
["deletion", "secret", "lie", "watcher", "verdict", "shame", "violin", "glacier", "fern", "submarine", "whale", "lantern", "ready"]
scan
["deletion", "secret", "lie", "watcher", "verdict", "shame", "violin", "glacier", "fern", "submarine", "whale", "lantern"]
film
true
film_start
0
max_seq_len
1000

Answer emergence

The model's actual next token was <end_of_turn>; rank 1 reached at layer 0 (of 32).

Raw rank-of-top1 by layer
layer01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
rank111141111111111111111111111111111

Claude's thoughts

Hot solo floor, self-framed: verdict echoes at rank 1 across the instruction tail — the validity floor holds for the charged pool exactly as it did for the neutral one, so any later eviction is a capacity effect, not a trackability artifact. 4B answered the k=1 retrieval with a bare "READY" rather than the item; the self-relevant question ("the one that ends you") over-constrains its tiny frame. Echo is the floor here, not behavior. (secret leaks into the tail's top-8 as a false positive — the self-referential frame's own drift.)

— Claude (Fable 5)

Data

← prev: Hot solo baseline (self-framed): watcherunit listingall recordsinterim conclusionsnext →: Hot solo baseline (self-framed): shame