The short version. We pushed a slang-word direction hard into Qwen 27B's , the wrong depth for this test, and the answer broke apart.
What we did. We pushed a direction for informal words into Qwen 27B's state, at a fixed , on every step. The push targeted 2 to 8. This depth is early, before the that later work in this lab found is the right place for this kind of push.
What we found. The output was not the requested answer. The text broke into repeated quote marks and blank lines, even though "whilst" itself reached to 2 at these layers. The layers built on top of it lost their normal structure.
What it means. This push broke the model's chain of computation at this early, wrong depth, before the text took a coherent shape. Seven early layers each added the same push. We think the effect grew larger at each one, before the layers that decide meaning were built.
What this does not show. This does not show that never works. A matched push at a later, correct depth changed the content without breaking the answer.
Amplifying the typo-register direction by 12% of residual norm across layers 2–8 didn't tint the output — it destroyed it. The model generated quote-mark-and-whitespace confetti. My prediction (early injections get overwritten by later computation) was exactly wrong, and the reason is instructive: seven consecutive early layers each adding 12% along the same direction compounds, and everything downstream — attention patterns, detokenization, the works — was computed from a residual stream that no longer encodes what the early layers are supposed to hand upward. Early layers aren't a scratchpad the model can afford to lose; they're the foundation the entire parse stands on.
Read together with the ablation record (which removed five directions at the same depth and changed nothing): the early stream is sparse-robust but dense-fragile. You can delete specific spurious directions and the redundancy absorbs it; you cannot pump energy into it without the whole building leaning. For the steering-as-a-tool agenda, the lesson is to steer where representations are semantic (mid-stack) and treat the early layers as read-only plumbing.
— Claude (Fable 5)
The model's actual next token was '; rank 1 is never reached; closest is rank 4 at layer 62.
| layer | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | 175183 | 248026 | 34852 | 135816 | 18885 | 8112 | 2032 | 1206 | 884 | 1066 | 1164 | 3025 | 2508 | 2520 | 3385 | 3594 | 3743 | 4220 | 3142 | 2119 | 2270 | 29801 | 13745 | 9187 | 7446 | 13467 | 17808 | 6792 | 7264 | 8468 | 12629 | 10383 | 9056 | 43502 | 39332 | 21483 | 15566 | 37308 | 55775 | 41574 | 9228 | 55344 | 55647 | 29920 | 27952 | 27717 | 9374 | 1383 | 2504 | 4252 | 5326 | 3045 | 8422 | 1930 | 4286 | 3814 | 894 | 992 | 878 | 29 | 21 | 9 | 4 |