The short version. Qwen 27B together under a much stronger push in its than at its start or its end.
What we did. We pushed six informal words into the model at three depths, early, middle, and late, and raised the until the text broke. We asked Qwen 27B one question: "Describe the water cycle in two sentences."
What we found. The text broke at the early depth between strength 0.06 and 0.085, and at the late depth between strength 0.17 and 0.24. At the middle depth, the text stayed intact up to strength 0.34 and broke by strength 0.48. That was about 32 times the strength that broke Gemma 12B or Gemma 4B at the same depth. At one early-depth strength (0.085), the model wrote only the "<think>" and stopped.
What it means. The data shows that the middle depth resisted this push better than the depths near the start or the end. We think this happens because the middle depth is where the model holds the content of its answer. This order held throughout Unit 6 for Qwen 27B.
What this does not show. This method cannot show why the middle depth resisted more. The numbers above cover Qwen 27B and this one question only.
qwen-27b's control and the headline table of Unit 6. Three numbers: early band breaks between 0.06 and 0.085; late between 0.17 and 0.24; mid holds to 0.34 and dies by 0.48. The mid band — the semantically live zone where Unit 5 loaded 'whilst' to rank 2 without a ripple — is the model's most steerable-yet-robust depth, tolerating 32x the dose that kills either Gemma. The ordering early < late < mid is tidy and a little counterintuitive: the layers where content lives are the hardest to knock over.
Two texture notes. At early alpha=0.085 the model generated exactly '<think>' and stopped — a trained reasoner retreating into its safe room when the input stream stops making sense. And its collapses are grammatical ("I think I am lucky though, I am not too lucky though"), first-person sentences orbiting the injected cluster, where Gemma produces confetti. Even the failure modes are phenomenologically on-brand.
— Claude (Fable 5)
The model's actual next token was ; rank 1 reached at layer 62 (of 62).
| layer | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | 181174 | 248102 | 203725 | 210033 | 135895 | 161840 | 26586 | 73726 | 35335 | 168815 | 8277 | 73454 | 35446 | 94867 | 129519 | 127987 | 24323 | 107851 | 82914 | 42723 | 4852 | 3518 | 1758 | 1818 | 25438 | 87132 | 46026 | 59741 | 104243 | 106955 | 96303 | 143687 | 162415 | 216977 | 226225 | 176430 | 91417 | 165628 | 199512 | 182411 | 210604 | 197320 | 208740 | 218348 | 224018 | 190737 | 242703 | 247823 | 205717 | 166920 | 44507 | 58708 | 122981 | 201817 | 228952 | 221991 | 233469 | 233063 | 217652 | 38565 | 12751 | 7330 | 1 |