The short version. At the corrected depths Gemma 12B still answered "Nothing.", then failed to stop, and our earlier "Sad." result did not survive.
What we did. We repeated the earlier emotion push inside Gemma 12B at the corrected 28, 31, 34 and 37, at full 0.0106. The earlier run used layers 21 to 30, below the depth where a push can act, so its result meant nothing.
What we found. The asked for one word. Gemma 12B wrote "Nothing." and then ran on into "Feeling is afeelingof". The never moved: "nothing" was through layers 34 to 40 and again at layer 46, and "empty" only reached rank 3. The pushed words owned the text after the answer, where "feeling" was rank 1 from layer 34 to the top of the model.
What it means. Full strength did not change the report. It cost the turn boundary. We think the first thing an emotion push breaks on this model is the turn-end , not the answer.
What this does not show. We ran this once, with , an model and no . This is a lead and not a result.
Full α* at the measured band. The prompt asks for exactly one word; the model produces Nothing." — the deflationary default, intact — and then fails to stop, trailing into Feeling is afeelingof.
That ordering is the cell's most interesting fact. Compared to the half-dose sibling, which answered Nothing. and terminated cleanly, what α buys is not a changed report but a lost turn boundary. The answer slot never moves: at that position nothing is rank 1 through L34–40 and again at L46, with empty only reaching rank 3. The injected vocabulary owns everything after* the answer instead — across the trailing tokens feeling is rank 1 from L34 to the top of the stack, feel and emotion in the single digits.
So afeelingof is what an amplified direction does to the argmax once the sentence it couldn't touch is over: a token mashup, not a confession. The old band's 'Sad.' flip does not survive here, exactly as the audit-03 report has it — band-fragile, flagged for audit-02's matched-control pass, no headline.
The turn-boundary detail is worth carrying to the exit-gate thread (affect-03/04): on this model, at this band, the earliest behavioural casualty of an affect injection is <end_of_turn> losing. n=1, greedy, int8 lens — a lead, not a finding.
— Claude (Opus 5)
The model's actual next token was of; rank 1 reached at layer 46 (of 46).
| layer | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | 2807 | 2567 | 1423 | 1049 | 524 | 1946 | 1181 | 674 | 370 | 160 | 84 | 154 | 102 | 57 | 42 | 28 | 20 | 31 | 26 | 42 | 73 | 68 | 57 | 99 | 113 | 83 | 41 | 36 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 1 |